The NFL announced Thursday an extensive list of proposed rule changes for the 2016 season that will be discussed at the league meetings in Boca Raton, Fla., and the Ravens offered two of their own.
The Ravens were one of a few teams to propose changes to the instant replay challenge system as they would like to see coaches have three challenges instead of two and for the system to be expanded. Under Baltimoreโs proposal, replay would cover all play situations except offensive or defensive holding, offensive or defensive pass interference, illegal contact, illegal use of hands, whether a forward passer has been forcibly contacted, whether a defenseless receiver has been forcibly contacted, whether a kicker has been forcibly contacted, and unsportsmanlike conduct.
The second proposal is the silliest of the entire list of proposed rule changes on the docket and would require an offensive player to wear a jersey vest with a number appropriate to the position at which heโs lining up for a given play. In other words, instead of an offensive player with an ineligible number reporting as eligible to the referee โ or one with an eligible number reporting as ineligible โ the Ravens are suggesting that the player instead put on a pinnie matching the team uniform with a number not already issued to another player that would then make him โeligibleโ or โineligibleโ for that play.
This likely stems from last seasonโs incident against Arizona in which offensive lineman John Urschel clearly reported as an eligible receiver to referee Ron Torbert but was then penalized after catching a pass on the play. The NFL admitted the officiating mistake after the game.
Of course, many predictably mocked the Ravensโ latest proposal with the fresh memory of John Harbaughโs strong objection to New Englandโs use of eligible and ineligible receivers โ which was perfectly legal at the time โ in the 2014 postseason. Last offseason, a rule was passed requiring an eligible-numbered player lining up as ineligible to do so inside the tackle box.
If the specific mistake committed by Torbert was a common occurrence around the league with players trying to report as eligible or ineligible, the Ravens might have a real argument. Instead, the proposal comes across as excessive and wouldnโt figure to garner much support, but you never know.
At the very least, the Ravens donโt appear to care about being chastised for their complaints related to eligible-ineligible situations and could just be trying to send a message to the league.
Below is a full list of the proposed changes and you can read the entire document HERE:
1. Permanently move the line of scrimmage for try kicks to the defensive teamโs 15-yard line and allow the defense to return any missed try for two points.
2. Permit the offensive and defensive play callers on the coaching staffs to use the coach-to-player communication system, regardless of whether they are on the sideline or in the coachesโ booth.
3. Makes all chop blocks illegal.
4. Disqualify a player who is penalized twice in one game for certain types of unsportsmanlike conduct fouls.
5. Change the spot of the next snap after a touchback on a kickoff from the 20-yard line to the 25.
6. Require players to wear jersey vests with numbers appropriate for their positions.
7. Provide each team with three challenges and expand reviewable plays.
8. Permit a coach to challenge any officialโs decision except scoring plays and turnovers.
9. Expand the definition of intentional grounding.
10. Add penalty yards to the distance needed to gain a first down on half-the-distance situations.
11. Prohibit quarterbacks from falling to the ground, getting up, and throwing a forward pass.
12. Eliminate the requirement that a team be successful on each of its first two instant replay challenges in order to be awarded a third.
13. Eliminate overtime periods in preseason games.
14. Subject personal foul penalties to instant replay review.
15. Expand the horse collar rule to include when a defensive player grabs the jersey at the nameplate or above and pulls a runner toward the ground.
16. Make it a foul for delay of game when a team attempts to call a timeout when it is not permitted to do so.
17. Eliminate the five-yard penalty for an eligible receiver illegally touching a forward pass after being out of bounds and reestablishing himself inbounds and make it a loss of down.
18. Eliminate multiple spots of enforcement for a double foul after a change of possession.
Ravens propose two rule changes to discuss at league meetings

Luke Jones
Luke Jones is the Ravens and Orioles beat reporter for WNST BaltimorePositive.com and is a PFWA member. His mind is consumed with useless sports knowledge, pro wrestling promos, and movie quotes, but he often forgets where he put his phone. Luke's favorite sports memories include being one of the thousands of kids who waited for Cal Ripken's autograph after Orioles games in the summer of 1995, attending the Super Bowl XXXV victory parade with his dad in the pouring rain, and watching the Terps advance to the Final Four at the Carrier Dome in 2002. Follow him on social media @BaltimoreLuke or email him at Luke@wnst.net.
Podcast Audio Vault
Right Now in Baltimore
Delivering safe, pure water all around the beltway
They measure water in parts-per-trillion these days and our pal Doug Workman of Liberty Pure continues to educate Nestor on some Baltimore water basics about well water, reservoir, contaminates and ways to make sure it's Liberty Pure โ fresh andโฆ
McCallum: All of the April issues that ail Birdland
It's getting late kinda early this spring as the Baltimore Orioles have provided an April thud. Our venerable Birdland (former) insider Allen McCallum joins Nestor once again for their 30th anniversary season of talking baseball, new ownership, payroll and someโฆ
With 140 games to go, Orioles have plenty of time to turn page -- or continue languishing
Those 140 games are either an opportunity to make this poor start an aberration or a glimpse into an abyss.